Exposition and Sermons
On Your Mark: The Cost of Not Compromising
0When the cost of telling the truth is high, it can seem prudent to dilute the truth in order to reduce the consequences. But is this right? This, and a discussion of the implications of knowing who Jesus really is, are covered in this sermon on Mark 6:14-29. Part of the “On Your Mark” series at Grace Reformed Church, Omaha, NE.
http://www.joelwnelson.com/files/Sermon-2010_10_17.pdf
âBy Faithâ â Message for my grandmaâs memorial service
1This is the text of the message I gave at my grandma’s memorial service on Saturday, July 31, 2010.
Copyright © Joel W. Nelson.  All rights reserved.  The text of this post or the contents of the message, including any excerpt thereof, may not be quoted, copied, or re-published in any form.
“By Faith”
We are gathered here today to reflect on and remember the life of Margaret Noel. But as I look around I realize some who are here today may be perplexed by the service so far. This may be unlike any funeral service youâve been to in the past. Shouldnât a funeral service be a time of great sadness, weeping, and mourning? Yet today we have sung happy songs, not dirges. Weâve spoken not of ending and finality, but of new life and beginnings. Weâve spoken confidently about seeing Margaret again one day, not in some vague sense, or wishfully, but knowing and believing it to be true. Why is it so?
The reason for this is what I want to focus most of my message today on â Margaretâs own faith, the faith she was so eager to share with those around her for over thirty years. So internalized was this faith in her life that even in her final days, one of the few things she really visibly responded to was the voice of a family member reading the Scriptures to her, or talking about heaven and how she would soon see Jesus â what she had been longing for – for so long.
What is this faith? In what is often called the Faith chapter of the Bible, Hebrews 11, the author describes it this way: âNow faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. For by it the people of old received their commendation. By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible. . . And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.â Just a couple paragraphs later, speaking of the many saints of the past who went before us, before even the time of Christ, at verse 13 we read, âThese all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city.â
Iâve gone over many passages of Scripture over the last couple weeks considering what to focus on in my message today. But Iâve decided that this is the one that really stands out as something that describes Margaret. She firmly believed that all things were created by the word of God, that God exists, rewards those who seek him, and that this world was not her home but instead that she longed for a much better place. And not only did she just give verbal assent to this faith, but she lived it. From 1978 when she first professed faith in Jesus Christ to 2010 when she entered into his presence for all eternity, her love for her Savior was clear to all who had the privilege of spending any time around her. Iâd like to start by going back and telling some of her story â the beginning of her faith.
In the late 1970s, Margaret became aware of Godâs work in her life. God opened her heart to spiritual things and put new life in her so that she could understand and believe that the only way to eternal life is through faith in Jesus Christ, and in August 1978 she trusted in Christ for salvation.
But Margaret also knew that this salvation was not something she had done for herself. She was quick to tell people that her salvation was a gift of God. Her salvation was also a work of God; not a decision she just made all of a sudden but rather something God did in her life. God used a number of different means — the preaching at Indian Hills Community Church here in Lincoln was an effectual means of convincing and converting Margaret.  Discussions with her children were another. So was a popular Christian book written a few years prior to the time which really got her thinking about spiritual things. All of these were things God used to point her toward Himself, and then He awakened her soul with new life so that she could take the step of believing in Him through faith alone for salvation.
Here are her own words on this â a few months ago, I found a handwritten account of her life written about twenty years ago. Iâll now read some excerpts from that.
In 1977 Bill started attending Indian Hills Community Church, and in January 1978 he began to invite me to go with him. One Sunday I decided to go, and it was a novel experience to be told I would need my Bible! Bill and a good friend of his had given me a New American Standard Bible which is an excellent translation written in modern language.
I learned that at IHCC they believe the Scriptures â both the old and new Testaments â to be the verbally inspired Word of God, written by men in Godâs control, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts and the final authority in faith and life.
Sometime in August 1978 â one Sunday â Bill asked me if I would go to Heaven when I died. I said I thought so but I wasnât sure. He told me I should be able to know. We had a wonderful talk and he showed me the booklet âThe Real Purpose of Life.â Things began to fall into place for me. For the first time I realized that John 3:16 meant me personally, but I had to claim Godâs promise by declaring my faith. I had a little green Gideon New Testament â I still have it, I should say. In the back is this printed statement: âConfessing to God that I am a sinner, and believing that the Lord Jesus Christ died for my sins on the Cross and was raised for my justification, I do now receive and confess Him as my personal Savior.â I signed that on 8/20/78.
Well, there was a lot to learn and I found myself eager to pursue. There are many verses in the Bible that mean so much, but few, if any, mean more to me than Ephesians Chapter 2, Verses 8 and 9 â
âFor by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast.â You see, that means it isnât my effort that saves me. Romans 3:23 says âFor all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.â And God hates sin and has declared the âwagesâ of sin is death. So for a long time I tried to figure it all out. If no one is good enough, who gets to heaven? God knew â and in His great mercy provided the way. Jesus left the Glory of Heaven to become a man. He went to the cross and in one horrible moment assumed⊠the sin of the world. When at the end he said, âIt is finished,â He meant that â the price had been paid. When He rose from the grave He had conquered death, so He could promise eternal life to all who believed in Him and gave their lives to Him. It is all so simple when you once believe, but is difficult for most of the world to accept.
I donât know why one person believes the gospel and another does not. I do know that since I came to know Christ I have not had one moment of doubt. Most of us spend our lives believing if we are good enough we will make it to Heaven, but salvation solely by faith is the primary doctrine of the Christian faith. This is not just faith in the person of Jesus Christ, but also faith in His sacrificial act on the Cross.
These were Margaretâs own words on this.
From the time she believed onward, this became one of the defining features of her life, and one of the things she most enjoyed talking about. In fact, the aforementioned document I recently found actually concluded with a statement â which I have interpreted to be one of her primary desires.
Speaking of her grandchildren, of which I am one, she wrote – âIt is my joy to help their parents teach them about the Lord Jesus Christ much earlier than they or I knew Him.â
As I stated earlier, from as far back as I can remember, this was one of her greatest joys â sharing her faith with her grandchildren, so that we could come to truly believe in Jesus Christ through faith alone by grace alone just as she had.
She lived her faith by her lifeâs example; she frequently spoke about the Lord and what He did. She would read stories about people of faith in the Bible to her grandchildren, buying books for us that helped to reinforce these themes. Also, she would not only pray for but also with us. She was directly involved in the spiritual upbringing of her grandchildren. I remember how every visit to her house started with a long catch-up conversation that included commitment to prayer, talking things out, and her working with us while at her house. Her phone calls, and later, email messages were focused in that direction, too. We knew she was praying for all of us and was listening to us too.
She also came alongside her children in raising her grandchildren. We werenât able to get away with extra things when our parents werenât around, except maybe for a few extra cookies or glasses of Gatorade on occasion. She respected her own childrenâs parenting styles, carrying on their values.
She often spoke about the example in the New Testament of the Eunice/Lois/Timothy relationship, where young Timothy was brought up by both his mother and grandmother, both having strong influence in his life, and Margaret delighted in it. She also gave a Bible to every grandchild and wrote a personal message to each grandchild in each Bible.
Speaking of her faith, Margaret also was quick to say that her belief in faith alone in Christ alone was by grace alone. As I look back today, as someone who has professed faith for over twenty years but only grasped the concept of grace for the last few years, and even still feel like Iâm barely getting it, I see just how much she lived and showed grace.
As just one example, and I could give many, I recall a time a number of years ago when I really doubted whether I was a Christian. I even wondered if I had committed whatâs called the eternal sin, or one that will never be forgiven. I remember she told me that if I was concerned about it, then that was pretty much a sure indicator I hadnât. It was years before I heard that said again, but that is such a true and grace-filled statement. I also remember during the years I was growing up, when I just wasnât sure I measured up, I could count on her to listen and remind me that God still loved me and wasnât angry with me. She also frequently reminded me to lighten up and worry less. In fact, I think the last email message I received from her was one from last summer when Iâd been through a time that had really tested my faith but Iâd come out of it seeing Godâs plan all the way through, and told her that â and even though it was by that point painful to type a response, she did so as to tell me how glad she was to hear that. These are but a few personal examples I can remember of how Margaret demonstrated her faith and her strong belief in the grace of God.
3 John 4 is another verse from Scripture that really applies to Margaretâs life since she believed by faith alone through grace alone in Christ alone, and shared it with her children and grandchildren, and I know would have also shared it with her greatgrandchild and future greatgrandchildren. The verse reads, âI have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth.â
But now at this point we must turn our attention from the past to the present and the future.
As long as I knew her, one of Margaretâs favorite topics to discuss was the doctrine of the last days, and especially to talk about heaven. It only seems fitting that on this occasion I should spend some time on this topic, considering her fondness for the topic â and that what she longed for so long, to see Jesus face to face, is now reality for her.
Iâm reminded of Romans 8:18 at this point, one of the many verses that family members shared with Margaret and reminded her of in her final days. Romans 8:18 really speaks to the way Margaret lived her life â living in the present but with the future always in view. It says, âFor I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us.â Life wasnât always easy for her. For almost as long as I knew her, she dealt with back pain that especially as the years progressed became more and more painful and restricting. But until more recently, you really wouldnât hear her complaining about it that much. She would talk about how itâs part of living in this world, and use that to lead into how much better the future perfect new creation would be. Â By faith she desired a better country, a heavenly one.
The Bible is full of references to the future new creation, from Old Testament references to the coming Messiah, the Kingdom he would bring, and ultimately, the eternal joy of Godâs people â to the New Testament references after the Kingdom was inaugurated speaking of the time when it would be consummated â the time still to come when Jesus will return, judge the world, reveals His own, and makes all things new and right. One of the most vivid depictions of this is found in the final chapters of Revelation, where Jesus revealed to John, his beloved disciple, a look at the spiritual side of the trials and tribulation of the present time and the wonderful promise of future eternal restoration.  Revelation is a book that as we well know has had a wide variety of interpretations over the years, and perhaps there have never been more interpretations than there are now.  Iâm not here today to make a statement on how one should view the book of Revelation and other instances of Biblical prophecy, though in saying this I am reminded of a time within the last 18 months when Margaret and I were discussing Revelation and the nature of things surrounding the Second Coming. She told me, âJoel, you know, I really donât think I see things the same way you do, but one thing is sure, in the end, weâre going to see Jesus.” And thatâs so true. As much as she loved to read different authors and commentatorsâ works on their interpretation of prophecy, what she loved even more was to look forward to the time when it will all be over and weâll be face-to-face with Jesus in the new creation. This was also one of the things that we kept reminding her of in her final days â soon youâre going to see Jesus, and thatâs going to be so much better â and then one day weâll be reunited in His presence.
Now with that in mind, Iâd like to read an excerpt from Revelation 21. This is at the end of all things as we know them, but for all who believe in Jesus Christ for salvation by faith alone, this will be the beginning of a perfect and wonderful eternity.
âAnd I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, âBehold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them, and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.â And He who sits on the throne said, âBehold, I am making all things new.â And He said, âWrite, for these words are faithful and true.â Then He said to me, âIt is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost. âHe who overcomes will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be My son.â
You see, though we are here today in memory of Margaret Noel, and this reminds us how much mourning, crying, and pain there is in this life â and the reality of death â because Margaret trusted in Christ for salvation, this really is a time of joy. The struggles of this life are over for her. Her soul is in the presence of Jesus now, and for all eternity. Those of us who also have received salvation through faith alone by grace alone in Christ alone do look forward with certainty to seeing her again.
But I also realize that not everyone here may be in that same position. You donât know where you stand with God right now, whether you really have been justified by faith alone. Maybe you assume youâll see her again because youâve lived a pretty good life, or maybe you believe in who Jesus is and what He has done, but because you trust also in your works youâre not really sure if youâve done enough for Him to accept you. Either way, maybe as you think about it now, you donât know for sure whether you will be reunited with Margaret one day and whether you will spend eternity in the wonderful new creation in the presence of Christ. If this is you, and you are concerned about this, then I urge you to not dismiss it from your mind. Over thirty years ago, God changed Margaretâs heart so that she realized she wasnât sure â and enabled her to believe and gave her the desire to believe, and she knew for sure. Just recently, realizing Margaret would soon be leaving this world, God awakened one of her grandchildren to be able to believe and caused her to see this and want to know for sure that she would one day see Margaret again.  I canât pressure you to make a decision right here on the spot — thatâs often not how God works â but if you take anything away from my message today, I am convinced Margaret would want it to be this â if God is working on you right now and you want to know for sure, donât dismiss the thought. There are pastors here today and many others who would be happy to talk with you and pray with you.
And finally, I want to end with this reminder â if you have believed in Jesus for salvation and you know where youâre going and you know youâll see Margaret again â while we miss her and are sad about the time of separation we now have â then this is also a time to rejoice as we celebrate Margaretâs graduation from this life to eternity, and we look forward to that day which is coming, when all who have been redeemed will dance in the presence of Jesus at the great wedding celebration when we are all reunited in the new creation. Itâs coming! The struggles we have now will be gone. Mourning, crying, and pain will all be things of the past. Sin and death, sorrow and hardship, will all pass away, and in their place will be eternal joy and unbroken fellowship with God, and all things will be new.
©2010 Joel W. Nelson. All rights reserved.
Adoption Is Permanent. Period.
0The following is a commentary on a current events situation. For some background information on the case I am presenting my opinion about, click here to read news coverage.
Societal Implications: This is yet another piece of evidence that American society is going deeper into consumerism, fair-weather allegiance and an insatiable appetite for instant gratification. Things that take a lot of blood, sweat, and tears are shunned in favor of whatever results in quick happiness. We seem to think we’re entitled to certain things that are NOT “rights”, and then act like a horrible injustice has been committed against us when we don’t get what we want (when we haven’t really worked hard for it). Case in point: having a family. Like it or not, a solid family structure involves a man and wife, father and mother. An intentional single-parent situation is already a shaky foundation for a family, but these days there are an increasing number of single men and women who want to have a family (i.e. children) without first laying the foundation (i.e. marriage). And other aspects of instant gratification in this area, such as sex without marriage and with no intent of children, are clearly related but beyond the scope of this post. Simply put, a single mother is not equipped to handle all aspects of raising a child (nor is a single father). I realize this still happens due to death, divorce, etc. but that does not change that it is not optimal. In this case, it seems that she may have wanted to have a child for HER pleasure and companionship. Her goals do not seem to have been for the child, but for her. When the “going got tough”, she bailed. Just like she might have returned a clothing item that didn’t fit right or an electronics device that had a short. News writers and columnists have pointed out that there is no evidence that she even tried to get help for the child, but only for herself. This continues to suggest that her world revolved completely around herself, and that the child may have only been an accessory to that. (Some reports indicate she even moved in the direction of adopting another child⊠treating human life the same as one might treat returns and exchanges at Wal-Mart.) Because his role from the beginning seems to only have been as a satellite around planet “Queen Me”, it does not seem that the adopted boy was in a climate where his needs could be addressed. Everything was stacked against him due to his adopted “mother’s” apparent focus far more on her own comfort and convenience than his needs. Yes, it seems there was a breakdown in the system — the adoption should never have been approved by social workers, agencies, and other reviewers. But it was. And a seven-year-old boy is certainly NOT the one that should have to bear the load of responsibility. I believe this is part of what is meant by the word “parent”.
Direct Implications: What must the child be thinking through all this? If he has previously had issues of distrust, lack of stability or structure, attachment and bonding issues, etc. — they have just been compounded. The actions of a so-called “responsible adult” (well, supposedly you’d expect a mother figure to be the responsible adult…) have only added to this boy’s issues. This experience will result in him trusting less, being even less willing to attach, having even less stability, etc. — by her actions, the woman in Tennessee has only compounded these problems to a much greater degree. Furthermore, her selfish shortsightedness has resulted in a massive amount of heartache in the fallout, as it appears that Russian adoptions to the United States will cease or be greatly delayed as a result. Countless amounts of people are now going to suffer greatly for the rash actions of a few.
Pro-Life Implications: It seems that this topic cannot be fully addressed without also touching on valuation of life implications. To view another human being as a commodity that can be “returned” (like one might do with a piece of unwanted, purchased, merchandise) is clearly to view that other person as inferior to one’s own self. In addition to being a parallel to the practice of chattel slavery, this seems to clearly go hand-in-hand with the practice of abortion. The convenience and well-being of the adult becomes elevated well above the fundamental needs of the dependent child/preborn child, to the point where the child’s well-being is flippantly disregarded so that even the child’s very life can be thrown away. Although it may have seemed like a good idea at one point (having sex or adopting), once the happy feelings wear off and reality sets in, the parent’s convenience takes precedence. Â In short: I don’t see how one can condone the actions of that “mother” in Tennessee and simultaneously claim to truly value life.
Ethnocentric Implications: Many of the comments posted on Internet news articles and blog posts supporting the adoptive mother seem to be filled with national and ethnic bias. Statements made such as “all Russian children are that way” or “that’s how they are” are not factual statements. While it may be true that the statistical average is higher, for reasons beyond the scope of this post, it is simply not true to say that “all” are a certain way. Such generalizations end up inferring that one’s own culture is superior, and that those from another culture are inferior just because they are of another culture. Many stereotypes are not unfounded, but to perpetuate a stereotype and then imply that “all” match the stereotype is unfair, and ultimately comes down to a form of ethnocentric arrogance. Who has the right to say that their culture is superior to another? For everything we can point out about damaging problems in other cultures, I’m quite convinced others could point out an equally long list in our own culture.
Spiritual Implications: From a Christian perspective, this set of implications is of very high importance. Some reports indicate that the woman at the center of this situation may be a professing Christian, or at least connected to a church community. I don’t know her, and am not in a position to comment with any degree of certainty on her spiritual condition — but I will say this: “Each tree is known by its own fruit.” (Luke 6:44)  Also, the extent to which we are able to love and forgive others is directly connected to the extent to which we understand the forgiveness and love God shows to all of us who are Christians. If any of us believes that God only had to forgive us a little bit because we only sinned a little bit, then we’re likely to hold others to a very high standard and only love and forgive them up to a point⊠usually equal to, or less than, the amount we think we’ve needed to be forgiven. (Read Matthew 18:23-35 with this in mind!) I suppose that this response may not be altogether out of place within an Arminian or Pelagian context, in which a human being has some goodness or some ability to actually reconcile with God. But from the Reformed view, it is altogether impossible to condone the actions of the woman in Tennessee without being totally inconsistent with what we say we believe. Here are three reasons for this: The first, as already alluded to, is that by believing in total depravity — that we bring absolutely nothing to the table when it comes to our salvation, and aren’t even able to respond to the offer of salvation without having first been “born again”, or made regenerate — we know that our justified standing now is only due to complete forgiveness on the part of the God that we have offended. There wasn’t any glimmer of innate goodness, or any moral standing on our part that made us stand out from others so as to be chosen for salvation.
The second reason comes from the Reformed doctrine of adoption. (Westminster Larger Catechism Q/A 74: “What is adoption? Adoption is an act of the free grace of God, in and for his only Son Jesus Christ, whereby all those that are justified are received into the number of his children, have his name put upon them, the Spirit of his Son given to them, are under his fatherly care and dispensations, admitted to all the liberties and privileges of the sons of God, made heirs of all the promises, and fellow heirs with Christ in glory.”) The doctrine of adoption means that Christians have been permanently made part of the family of God. There’s not a thing any Christian can do to ever get kicked out of the family (no matter how deservedly). Not even one day passes when every adopted son or daughter of God does not willfully act in a manner unbecoming a member of God’s family. We disobey God, we effectively spit in his face, we tear down the reputation of his name and family, we rebel, we run away, we act like we’re “growing up” and don’t need him anymore⊠and we remain in the family. We remain in the family because we’re in, we’re assured we’re in, and the shed blood of Jesus keeps us in. With this in mind, we have no choice but to view human adoption in the same terms. If we fail to do so, I see no alternative but to say that we do not even understand the magnitude of our own spiritual adoption. We apparently believe down deep that God will cut us off from his family if we slip up once too many times. Or we believe the dispensational untruth that we, the church, are just an afterthought in God’s eyes, of lesser status than his “first” children. The fact is, spiritual adoption is permanent, and anything else is a damned lie. If we believe this, we have no business at all even hinting anything different to human adopted children. If you read this and disagree, I would venture to say you are still holding on to some righteousness of your own, some merit, some entitlement — and in doing so, legalistically demanding merit from others as well.
Third, and directly connected to the previous two reasons, those who have been forgiven much forgive much. Those who have been forgiven little forgive little. (Luke 7:47) We love because he first loved us. (1 John 4:19) As Jerry Bridges points out in Transforming Grace, if we really understand grace, we relinquish the right to be offended by another person’s actions because we know that what another person can do to us pales in contrast to what our sin did to Jesus. (Yet never forget that he didn’t HAVE to die for anyone⊠because of sin, all deserve death. But he CHOSE to die in our place so that we would live.) If we really believe that God loves us, we have no choice but to show the same sacrificial love to others. This love goes so far as to give up everything — even life — for another. No matter the baggage, no matter how messed up, no matter what⊠this is the love we’ve received, and we simply don’t understand it (or maybe haven’t really even received it) if we can’t show it to another person. Consider this excerpt from Romans in this context: “For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will scarcely die for a righteous personâthough perhaps for a good person one would dare even to dieâ but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.â (Romans 5:6â8)
So to conclude, there should be no other view for a Christian other than that adoption is permanent, and that an adopted child is of complete, full, equal standing as a natural-born child. Yes, there can be unforeseen issues when you bring a child into your home when that child comes in with his/her own baggage, own history, etc. The issues can be of such magnitude that they rock your world and cause you to have to give up many things. Then consider your history, your being brought into the family of God on no merit of your own, what you even still do to him even now⊠ and keep this perspective always fresh.
Closing comment 1: It seems like such a shame that the actions of one selfish woman in response to a needy and immature child should be allowed to threaten to end the hopes and dreams of many orphaned children, and many families waiting to receive them — as seems to now be the case.
Closing comment 2: It is clear that sacrificial, unconditional love and selfishness can’t coexist.
Closing comment 3: In contrast, consider this example of unconditional love. A couple of years ago, some friends told me of friends of theirs who have a very unstable child they had adopted, who would act out in extreme ways (including threats). Despite an attempt (or two) to destroy the family home, the parents affirmed the child by saying: “You can burn down our home. You can even kill us. But that doesn’t change that you are a member of this family.”
How (Not) To Reform A Nation
0Will national reformation take place when the right men are in office? Find out in this sermon from January 10, 2010, on 2 Kings 9-10 (focusing on King Jehu of Israel).
link:Â How (Not) To Reform A Nation (2 Kings 9-10)
The Tenth Commandment: Coveting vs. Thanksgiving
0At church this fall, the sermon series is on the Ten Commandments, specifically breaking down each commandment for a close look. Also, in one of the small groups I am in, weâre reading through Francis Schaefferâs book âTrue Spiritualityâ this month. Thus, it seems very fitting that one of the main themes of the book ties right in to the Ten Commandments.
Specifically, in the opening chapter, Schaeffer points out that â[t]he climax of the Ten Commandments is the tenth commandment in Exodus 20:17⊠[t]he commandment not to covet is an entirely inward thing. Coveting is never an outward thing, from the very nature of the case. It is an intriguing factor that this is the last command that God gives us in the Ten Commandments and thus the hub of the whole matter⊠[W]e break this last commandmentâŠbefore we break any of the others. Any time that we break one of the other commandments of God, it means that we have already broken this commandment in coveting.â
Why is this commandment so pivotal? Schaeffer wrote that âCoveting is the negative side of the positive commands, âLove the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind⊠and love your neighbor as yourself.â The only way to not break this commandment is to find in Christ all that one needs. Anytime thereâs something more that we think we need than what we already have â which then forms the impetus for breaking the other commandments â so that we turn to other âgodsâ, find satisfaction in things, take Godâs name in vain, disregard the Lordâs day by justifying the âneedâ to work on that day, dishonor those in authority, boil in anger to the point of murdering in oneâs heart or beyond, desire sexual relations outside the God-ordained design, take what belongs to another, tell lies, etc. â at the root is a covetous desire for something we believed we should have that we were not given.
The apostle James wrote, âWhat causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you? You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions. You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God.â
But what about legitimate desires? God does place within us desires for good things. How are we to know what is legitimate and what is covetous? Schaeffer describes two tests. The first is to ensure we love God enough to be contented. Another way to look at this is to consider John Piperâs statement that âGod is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in Him.â
Schaeffer wrote, âWhen I lack proper contentment, either I have forgotten that God is God, or I have ceased to be submissive to him. We are now speaking about a practical test to judge if we are coveting against God. A quiet disposition and a heart giving thanks at any given moment is the real test of the extent to which we love God at that moment. I would like to give some strong words to you from the Bible to remind us that this is Godâs own standard for Christians: âBut sexual immorality and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints. Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving.â
In Ephesians 5:20, we are commanded to âbe filled with the Spirit, addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus ChristâŠâ
Notice the word âeverything.â It leaves no wiggle room for some things to not be thankful for. Whatever it is, the command is to be thankful. The alternative is the core of manâs rebellion against God: a lack of thankfulness and a desire for something that God didnât provide. This was at core of the temptation in the Garden of Eden. And itâs at the core of the battles and struggles we face daily. How often do we effectively deny what we tell others we believe, by virtue of being Christians, when we donât live with a thankful spirit. When instead of being grateful for what we have, we have to fight for something more, we are in effect denying Christ. We are making ourselves to be as gods. And then in that new I-centric paradigm, itâs not long until the other commandments become irrelevant too. In fact, Schaeffer points out the contrast to being thankful always and for everything, from Romans 1:21 â a passage describing the reprobate. âFor although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.â This is how serious it is to not be fully satisfied in God!
Schaefferâs second test as to when proper desire becomes coveting is âthat we should love men enough not to envy.â This envy isnât just material possessions. It can even be spiritual gifts, Schaeffer points out. Any time any of us sees a gift, a talent, a station in life, etc. that another person has and then desires it to the point where we wouldnât mind seeing that person slide a bit so that we can have some or all of what they have, the desire has become coveting. From this point, violation of the rest of the Ten Commandments is also near. Yet how pervasive this is! Schaeffer points out how even in areas where we are going toward a common goal, such as in the Kingdom of Christ, we often find some satisfaction in seeing ârivalsâ (such as in other denominations) taking a fall. When we see another personâs righteous works, we often try to then use our ability and will to try to get this righteous too (or else just shun that person as being âtoo goodâ). Even this is a form of coveting! And ultimately this inward coveting, as it is allowed to grow, manifests itself outwardly. Schaeffer notes, âIf I were to be happy if he were to lose something, the next step in the external world is moving either subtly or more openly to cause him to have the loss.â Anytime we act in any other way than in love, itâs a sign of coveting.
If the commandment is this far-reaching, who can keep it?! No one. That is precisely how Paul discovered first-hand that no man can keep the Law. (Romans 7:7-8 – âFor I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, âYou shall not covet.â But sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. For apart from the law, sin lies dead.â) The only one who can keep the law fully is Christ. May we find all we need â for satisfaction, for completion, for righteousness — in Him this Thanksgiving season!
Holding on to the Promises: A look at the life of King David
0Been reading through 1 and 2 Samuel (in the 1599 Geneva Bible this time â a challenging read, but good) and one thing jumped out to me that I hadnât really focused on before. Thatâs the amount of time David had to wait between when something was promised and when it came true.
Letâs look at a few examples:
David was probably a teenager, maybe 14 or 15 years old when anointed as the next king (1 Sam. 16). However, in 2 Sam. 5:4 we find that at least fifteen years elapsed before David was actually crowned king, as he was thirty years old when he became king over the tribe of Judah. The time in between was a difficult period of attempts on his life, being hunted by the king, living in caves, living among foreigners, etc.
David was 30 when he became king in Hebron, but it was another 7 years before he became king over all of Israel. This was a time marked by political unrest, with most of what was supposed to be his kingdom being ruled by a son of Saul, as well as issues in his own ranks with the impetuous of the sons of Zeruiah.
After assuming the throne in Jerusalem, David desired to build a house (of worship) for God. However, this too was delayed as it was not David who would build it, but rather Davidâs son Solomon. And David was also promised peace and an everlasting kingdom (2 Sam. 7), something that was not physically fulfilled in his lifetime or even in his sonsâ lifetimes, but rather in Christ and His kingdom (and ultimately not fully fulfilled until the future new heavens and new earth).
Yet another thing that stands out is how despite the long wait, David did not try to force these promised things sooner than God had ordained. He did not try to take the kingdom from Saul; nor did he try to wrest it away from Ish-Bosheth, Saulâs son. No indication is given that he was discontent to return to the sheep after being anointed as the next king of Israel. Instead, he carried out what he needed to be doing at the present time, leaving the future to God and trusting in His promises of what He would eventually do.
âHe who has ears to hear, let him hear.â