Posts tagged fundamentalism
What’s wrong with this quote?
1“God says it. I believe it. That settles it [for me].”
When Family Values Become Idolatry
0The institution of the family is one of the most basic building blocks of a society. But it is not the most basic level, as a family is a unit comprised of individuals. Yet today there are many who say that the family, not the individual, is the base unit of society. What is the difference?
The main difference is that if we fail to view the family as a sum of unique parts, but instead view it as a single homogenous entity, we fail to recognize the distinct individuals in each family. For example, if the family is overemphasized, the desire to preserve family unity and appearance ends up trumping each individual’s gifts and personal needs.
Therefore, it is important that while there is no need to denigrate the family, there is also inherent danger in exalting it to the point where it becomes the end in itself, a public face that all members of the family must sacrifice to in order to maintain the family image.
Moving from hypothetical generalities to specific instances: there is a fringe organization known as the Vision Forum, a parachurch group located in Texas, which emphasizes the family unit to the point where individualism is almost looked down upon. The organization’s stated purpose is that they are “dedicated to the restoration of Christian family culture.”[i] What does that “Christian family culture” entail?
First, it appears that it entails a patriarchal figure determining a goal for his descendants – and then doing what is necessary to ensure his children and his children’s children meet his goal. As stated in an informational page on the Vision Forum website: “For our children to be mighty in the land, we must embrace a long-term vision of victory, and this will only be achieved if we take steps now to plan and implement multi-generational goals for our families.”[ii] Personally, I find it highly pompous that an individual would try to prescribe goals for his children and grandchildren – and further descendants for the next 200 years![iii] There are some things which are acceptable – even commendable – such as desiring to see one’s children and grandchildren and many generations beyond that serving the Lord. But this goal should not be for one’s own legacy, reputation, or benefit. Instead, the goals advocated include number of children one’s own children and grandchildren will have, skills they are to attain, books they are to write, and even businesses they are to establish.[iv]
Second, as previously alluded to, this system (commonly entitled “patriarchy”)[v] denies the individuality of each member of the family. If each family member is simply a pawn in the hand of the almighty patriarch, whether he be the father, grandfather, great-grandfather, or long-since-passed-on great-great-grandfather, then he has no individual rights, no room to fulfill his own dreams, and ultimately, no freedom to be who God has called him to be. Under the ideals presented by this patriarchal system, a man is not even granted the freedom to set his own goals until he marries. But even the individual he marries is not ultimately a choice he makes, but rather something that his parents have a significant role in setting up.[vi] (Disclaimer: This is not cited directly from a Vision Forum publication, but rather from the writings of someone influenced by Vision Forum. My personal experience from dialogue with those involved with and influenced by VF materials confirms that this is a prevalent VF teaching and thus falls within the scope of this examination.)
The patriarchal system, however, leaves even less freedom for women than it does for men. Within the system presented as an ideal – no, not just an ideal, but a mandate – a married woman has no other place than at home, cleaning, cooking, sewing, and producing babies. Single women are said to “have more flexibility in applying the principle that women were created for a domestic calling,”[vii] but even so are made to feel like anything but being a homemaker is not only less than ideal, but actually sinful.
For unmarried men and women, Vision Forum explicitly states that they remain under their father’s jurisdiction until the point of being released.[viii] This concept of release is extrabiblical but has been well-established as a law within families and churches that subscribe to the patriarchal doctrines.
This causes unnecessary heartache for parents and their adult offspring alike. The framework is set such that adult children are likely to feel guilty for even desiring something for themselves apart from the “vision” set by their parents. Thus, it is not uncommon for someone past the age of 20, perhaps even past the age of 30, to live under their parents’ roof, be entirely dependent on their parents, and have no goals apart from what their parents set. Should they have an individual desire, in all likelihood it will be seen as rebellion and be treated as wrong. As stated above, even marriage is something which tends to be overseen by the parents. This ultimately fulfills the previously stated goal of the subsequent generations following the vision set by the patriarch, or in simpler terms, one’s ability to have grandchildren made pretty close to his own image. This level of control is unhealthy, both for the “patriarch” (due to him becoming a “priest figure” or even a “god figure”) as well as the offspring, who have the equivalent of a human guru or priest guiding their way instead of having these decisions be the product of their relationship with Christ. And ultimately, it becomes a form of idolatry, because something other than Jesus Christ becomes the primary focus. The focus may be doing whatever it takes to get a “Christian America”, looking good in society, being well-spoken of, ideals of “militant fecundity”[ix], etc. (for the patriarch), or looking to a human rather than to God for direction (for the offspring). Either way, something or someone has entered a role that should belong to God alone, and this is idolatry.
If the reader is one who sees himself as a “patriarch,” I urge you to re-evaluate your goals. I would venture to say that anything more than desiring that your children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and so on be strong followers of Christ is more than necessary. Many things may be your vision, feeding your ego – and may not be God’s will for those individuals, who are individuals before God just as you are, with equal rights and equal access to God. The only thing that you can, and should, desire is that they be strong Christians, trusting in Christ alone (not you, not anyone else, but Christ alone). And if the reader is an offspring or someone who is under the authority of a “patriarch” – consider whether you are in a position where your relationship with Christ can be your own or if another is putting himself in a position to be as your “high priest,” a mediator between God and you. “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time.”[x] If this is the case, you must prayerfully evaluate whether you can persuade the individual to let you be free in Christ, or whether leaving is the healthier option. And finally, as Paul exhorted Timothy, “Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.”[xi]
[i] “Description” meta tag, http://www.visionforum.com/, 4/25/08
[ii] Retrieved from http://www.visionforum.com/booksandmedia/productdetail.aspx?productid=43872 on 4/25/08.
[iii] http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2008/03/3482.aspx
[iv] http://www.mikesoutherland.com/blog/2006/12/thatll-never-work-lets-just-see-about.html
[v] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx
[vi] http://www.mikesoutherland.com/blog/2006/12/thatll-never-work-lets-just-see-about.html, paragraph 11
[vii] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx, items #13-15
[viii] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx, item #22
[ix] http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2007/05/2614.aspx
[x] I Timothy 2:5,6. The Holy Bible, English Standard Version
Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers.
[xi] I Timothy 4:12. The Holy Bible, English Standard Version
Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers.
Standard Bearers
4Read this if you, or anyone you know, has ever been involved in a standards-centric or patriarchal movement such as the Institute in Basic Life Principles or Vision Forum, family-centered churches (including many Independent Fundamental Baptist churches), or any non-mainstream homeschool group.
Curse of the Standard Bearers, Part 1
Curse of the Standard Bearers, Part 2
Curse of the Standard Bearers, Part 3
Mystery of Mercy
1A couple days ago I came across a posting on a discussion board I visit periodically in which the author expressed frustration with a couple particular elements of popular Christianity. Much of his post centered around apparent frustration with dispensational teachings (especially the “rapture”) and semi-Pelagianism (loss of salvation due to poor performance) — namely that one could do something wrong, lose salvation, miss the “rapture”, and thus be “left behind.” He said he was “terrified” that some mistake would cause him to be left behind and be tormented by “the Antichrist.” Quoting: “what if I commit a sin, and don’t have time to confess and ask God forgiveness and repent and get…left behind?!” “what if I’m in some sin that I don’t even recognize and I get……left behind?” “what if I’m watching something on TV that’s somehow a “sin” and Jesus returns and I get……left behind?” “what if I commit the unpardonable sin and get….left behind?”
There was a time when I, too, believed in the dispensational model and was influenced by numerous semi-Pelagians. I shared these same questions and had these same frustrations… as did (and do) many, many others. Yes, each side has the Bible to back their views up… but careful study is needed to see that some interpretations do not hold up.
But the author of the post I refer to grew deeply depressed over this. All his life he had been fed a system of works… be good, no, be perfect… or “God will be displeased and do something to you.” Apparently he never found the truth, found freedom from this system, found a way of escape. Before two weeks passed he had killed four people in Colorado and he himself was dead also.
Where were the people who could have shown him truth when he was searching? Surely not all were locked into the mindset that many of us know all too well… that all music with a beat is demonic, that there is an umbrella of [human] authority shielding underlings from great harm, that it is rebellious to seek truth on one’s own… or most of all, that our performance could increase or decrease our standing with God. Where were the people who knew the truth?
And for all of us who asked these same questions, who at one time or another felt this same frustration, who once were part of this same belief system…
why has our story turned out any different?
Let me tell you this: it sure isn’t our goodness that has resulted in a different story for you and me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am the woman at the well, I am the harlot
I am the scattered seed that fell along the path
I am the son that ran away
And I am the bitter son that stayed
My God, my God why hast Thou accepted me
When all my love was vinegar to a thirsty King?
My God, my God why hast Thou accepted me
It’s a mystery of mercy and the song, the song I sing
I am the angry man who came to stone the lover
I am the woman there ashamed before the crowd
I am the leper that gave thanks
But I am the nine that never came
My God, my God why hast Thou accepted me
When all my love was vinegar to a thirsty King?
My God, my God why hast Thou accepted me
It’s a mystery of mercy and the song, the song I sing
You made the seed that made the tree
That made the cross that saved me
You gave me hope when there was none
You gave me your only Son
My God, Lord you are
My God, my God, Lord you are
–Caedmon’s Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note: I am not making the allegation that IBLP or Bill Gothard is responsible for the recent tragedy in Colorado. However, the belief and lifestyle structure set forth by IBLP, as well as the prevalent teachings associated with dispensationalism, semi-Pelagianism and Pentecostal belief, all certainly seem to have been catalysts. Not directly responsible, as no one is responsible for the actions of another, but still part of the bigger picture.
I stand at the door and knock…
1Originally posted on Saturday, July 14, 2007. All rights reserved. Text may not be copied or quoted in any way.
Rev. 3:20 ~ Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me.
All right, who thinks this is an evangelistic verse? Who has a picture of Jesus standing at a door alone, knocking, just waiting for someone to open the door and let him in? Who has told someone that the way to be saved is to open the door and let Jesus in?
Well, sorry to burst anyone’s bubble, but this verse isn’t applicable as an evangelistic verse. It was written to the church in Laodicea, which was a group of believers that had become “lukewarm” in their deeds. Despite being believers in Jesus Christ (Christians), they had broken fellowship by essentially being self-sufficient. They had an inflated view of their own goodness as opposed to recognizing their needs. It was as if they had everything and thus did not need fellowship with Christ. Did they do as He commanded? Or did they just piously shun people and focus only on themselves? Did they reach out to the needy with the love of Christ (realizing that apart from His grace they were just the same) or did they look the other way?
Jesus wanted fellowship with them! While their salvation was not in question, they were not living as Jesus would have them live — and in doing so, they left Him out of their church! Perhaps they thought that they were on the right track and were certain that His blessing was on them… or perhaps for the sake of their own fellowship they left “the least of these” out on the street. Whatever the cause was, the church was so self-fulfilled that they had no need for Jesus, His grace, and fellowship with Him. And Jesus wanted to be in close fellowship with them once again.
What are the dangers of using this as a salvation verse? First, it’s a misapplication that comes from taking the verse out of context. Second, it is a wrong salvation message. The message is “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ”, not “ask Jesus into your heart.” Nowhere in Scripture do we find an invitation to “ask Jesus into our hearts” and then be saved. This is a false teaching that is propagated like wildfire in modern evangelism! Third, if this is a salvation message, then it is promoting salvation by works. The context refers to the deeds of the Laodicean church. It also has a call to action — open the door. If this refers to salvation, then it teaches that an action is necessary as a prerequisite to salvation. It implies that Jesus helplessly stands by waiting for someone to choose to open the door and let him in. What could be farther from the truth?!
What about those who have responded to the Holy Spirit’s call after of hearing this verse? Well, God is not limited by our shortcomings. Even if we completely distort the Gospel, the Holy Spirit can still work. We may have blown it, but God still used it for good. But at the same time, there may be many who think that all they have to do is mystically open the door and ask Jesus in and then they are saved. They can go on living in sin but still think they’re going to heaven because they “said the magic words” and asked Him in. Of course, if these people are to be saved, then God will still bring it about… but as we do what we are commanded to do — fulfill the Great Commission — we still have a responsibility to clearly present the truth.
The works-based, holiness-driven, “ask Jesus in” theology of Pelagius was condemned as a heresy in the 4th century A.D., yet has continued as a small faction throughout the years. However, not until Charles Finney and the Second Great Awakening has Pelagian teaching become so prominent. Starting in the 19th century, propagated by nearly all of the “great” evangelists and revival teachers, Pelagian theology has again risen to prominence in American evangelicalism. It’s time for the church to stop spreading this distorted version of the Gospel and return to teaching salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone for the glory of God alone by the authority of Scripture alone.