Posts tagged grace

Informational Preaching?

0

“The ‘informational’ view of preaching conceives of preaching as changing people’s lives after the sermon. They listen to the sermon, take notes, and then apply the Biblical principles during the week. But this assumes that our main problem is a lack of compliance to Biblical principles, when … all our problems are actually due to a lack of joy and belief in the gospel. Our real problem is that Jesus’ salvation is not as real to our hearts as the significance and security our idols promise us. If that’s our real problem, then the purpose of preaching is to make Christ so real to the heart that in the sermon people have an experience of his grace, and the false saviors that drive us lose their power and grip on us on the spot. That’s the ‘experiential’ view of preaching (Jonathan Edwards).”

When Family Values Become Idolatry

0

The institution of the family is one of the most basic building blocks of a society. But it is not the most basic level, as a family is a unit comprised of individuals. Yet today there are many who say that the family, not the individual, is the base unit of society. What is the difference?

The main difference is that if we fail to view the family as a sum of unique parts, but instead view it as a single homogenous entity, we fail to recognize the distinct individuals in each family. For example, if the family is overemphasized, the desire to preserve family unity and appearance ends up trumping each individual’s gifts and personal needs.

Therefore, it is important that while there is no need to denigrate the family, there is also inherent danger in exalting it to the point where it becomes the end in itself, a public face that all members of the family must sacrifice to in order to maintain the family image.

Moving from hypothetical generalities to specific instances: there is a fringe organization known as the Vision Forum, a parachurch group located in Texas, which emphasizes the family unit to the point where individualism is almost looked down upon. The organization’s stated purpose is that they are “dedicated to the restoration of Christian family culture.”[i] What does that “Christian family culture” entail?

First, it appears that it entails a patriarchal figure determining a goal for his descendants – and then doing what is necessary to ensure his children and his children’s children meet his goal. As stated in an informational page on the Vision Forum website: “For our children to be mighty in the land, we must embrace a long-term vision of victory, and this will only be achieved if we take steps now to plan and implement multi-generational goals for our families.”[ii] Personally, I find it highly pompous that an individual would try to prescribe goals for his children and grandchildren – and further descendants for the next 200 years![iii] There are some things which are acceptable – even commendable – such as desiring to see one’s children and grandchildren and many generations beyond that serving the Lord. But this goal should not be for one’s own legacy, reputation, or benefit. Instead, the goals advocated include number of children one’s own children and grandchildren will have, skills they are to attain, books they are to write, and even businesses they are to establish.[iv]

Second, as previously alluded to, this system (commonly entitled “patriarchy”)[v] denies the individuality of each member of the family. If each family member is simply a pawn in the hand of the almighty patriarch, whether he be the father, grandfather, great-grandfather, or long-since-passed-on great-great-grandfather, then he has no individual rights, no room to fulfill his own dreams, and ultimately, no freedom to be who God has called him to be. Under the ideals presented by this patriarchal system, a man is not even granted the freedom to set his own goals until he marries. But even the individual he marries is not ultimately a choice he makes, but rather something that his parents have a significant role in setting up.[vi] (Disclaimer: This is not cited directly from a Vision Forum publication, but rather from the writings of someone influenced by Vision Forum. My personal experience from dialogue with those involved with and influenced by VF materials confirms that this is a prevalent VF teaching and thus falls within the scope of this examination.)

The patriarchal system, however, leaves even less freedom for women than it does for men. Within the system presented as an ideal – no, not just an ideal, but a mandate – a married woman has no other place than at home, cleaning, cooking, sewing, and producing babies. Single women are said to “have more flexibility in applying the principle that women were created for a domestic calling,”[vii] but even so are made to feel like anything but being a homemaker is not only less than ideal, but actually sinful.

For unmarried men and women, Vision Forum explicitly states that they remain under their father’s jurisdiction until the point of being released.[viii] This concept of release is extrabiblical but has been well-established as a law within families and churches that subscribe to the patriarchal doctrines.

This causes unnecessary heartache for parents and their adult offspring alike. The framework is set such that adult children are likely to feel guilty for even desiring something for themselves apart from the “vision” set by their parents. Thus, it is not uncommon for someone past the age of 20, perhaps even past the age of 30, to live under their parents’ roof, be entirely dependent on their parents, and have no goals apart from what their parents set. Should they have an individual desire, in all likelihood it will be seen as rebellion and be treated as wrong. As stated above, even marriage is something which tends to be overseen by the parents. This ultimately fulfills the previously stated goal of the subsequent generations following the vision set by the patriarch, or in simpler terms, one’s ability to have grandchildren made pretty close to his own image. This level of control is unhealthy, both for the “patriarch” (due to him becoming a “priest figure” or even a “god figure”) as well as the offspring, who have the equivalent of a human guru or priest guiding their way instead of having these decisions be the product of their relationship with Christ. And ultimately, it becomes a form of idolatry, because something other than Jesus Christ becomes the primary focus. The focus may be doing whatever it takes to get a “Christian America”, looking good in society, being well-spoken of, ideals of “militant fecundity”[ix], etc. (for the patriarch), or looking to a human rather than to God for direction (for the offspring). Either way, something or someone has entered a role that should belong to God alone, and this is idolatry.

If the reader is one who sees himself as a “patriarch,” I urge you to re-evaluate your goals. I would venture to say that anything more than desiring that your children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and so on be strong followers of Christ is more than necessary. Many things may be your vision, feeding your ego – and may not be God’s will for those individuals, who are individuals before God just as you are, with equal rights and equal access to God. The only thing that you can, and should, desire is that they be strong Christians, trusting in Christ alone (not you, not anyone else, but Christ alone). And if the reader is an offspring or someone who is under the authority of a “patriarch” – consider whether you are in a position where your relationship with Christ can be your own or if another is putting himself in a position to be as your “high priest,” a mediator between God and you. “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time.”[x] If this is the case, you must prayerfully evaluate whether you can persuade the individual to let you be free in Christ, or whether leaving is the healthier option. And finally, as Paul exhorted Timothy, “Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.”[xi]


[i] “Description” meta tag, http://www.visionforum.com/, 4/25/08

[ii] Retrieved from http://www.visionforum.com/booksandmedia/productdetail.aspx?productid=43872 on 4/25/08.

[iii] http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2008/03/3482.aspx

[iv] http://www.mikesoutherland.com/blog/2006/12/thatll-never-work-lets-just-see-about.html

[v] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx

[vi] http://www.mikesoutherland.com/blog/2006/12/thatll-never-work-lets-just-see-about.html, paragraph 11

[vii] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx, items #13-15

[viii] http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx, item #22

[ix] http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2007/05/2614.aspx

[x] I Timothy 2:5,6. The Holy Bible, English Standard Version

Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers.

[xi] I Timothy 4:12. The Holy Bible, English Standard Version

Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers.

A thought for the day…

0

Regeneration

Precedes
Faith

…because as ironic as it may originally sound, who can have what is known as “saving faith” without having first been “reborn”?

What Do We Bring to Salvation? Anything?

0

This is a topic I have learned quite a bit more about over the last year or so, coming from a background emphasizing the importance of good works (we do good and God loves us for it) rather than grace (we bring nothing, not even love for God, yet still He loves us). A common manifestation of a works-based environment is the need to always strive for perfection in order to be accepted, both by God and others. Even if people who hold to this form of works-based righteousness deny this charge, I believe it applies nonetheless as the attitude is not one of complete brokenness and emptiness but rather trying to bring something of value to God and then letting Him “take care of the rest.” As if we had anything to bring that could be used as a starting point for God! The point is that anything we try to do in order to look good to God, and to be more acceptable to him, will fail. It looks so good to us; other Christians might stand in awe at how spiritual another is, but in reality, it’s basically filth. Excrement. “Filthy rags,” the Bible calls it.

Good Friday

0

Good Friday.

The first question one often asks when considering the name of the day is “why is it called ‘good’?”. (Answer: derived from “holy Friday”, c. 1290 A.D., via German “Gute Freitag“.) The question is often raised due to the traditional observation of the day with sadness, gloom, and mourning.
To many, even to some who profess faith in Jesus Christ, the true purpose of the day seems to be lost. Consider this quotation: “An incarnate God!!! An eternal, self-existent, omnipresent omniscient Author of this stupendous Universe, suffering on a Cross!!! My Soul starts with horror, at the Idea, and it has stupified the Christian World. It has been the Source of almost all of the Corruptions of Christianity.” (John Adams)

Or even megachurch leader Joel Osteen, who does not deny the importance of the cross but seeks to downplay its remembrance in favor of positive thinking: “We don’t have crosses up there. We believe in all that, but I like to take the barriers down that have kept people from coming. A lot of people who come now are people that haven’t been to church in 20 to 30 years.”

But it is not just famous people such as these. Many other professing Christians speak of Good Friday as unimportant, boring, and sad. They may even speak of it in tragic terms.
And in response I say this: If you cannot be humbly grateful that the death penalty was paid for you when you perfectly deserved to be on receiving end of the firing squad — then perhaps you would rather have had to die for your own sins? Is the cross of no value to you? Whether we want to admit it or not, sin is real, and thus, punishment is real. It will not be stayed, as that would be unjust. No one deserves to be spared, but the fact is that Jesus took the punishment for some. That’s right, the punishment was taken and the record cleared.
So if you still want to go ahead and downplay Good Friday, then make sure you do a good job of living your life beyond perfection and see where it gets you.
Or realize the true greatness of what was done on Good Friday, and realize that the punishment has been taken by a Substitute, despite the death penalty being entirely deserved, and go free in forgiveness. Humbly realize your best goodness still wouldn’t be enough to have the death sentence cancelled, and rely fully on the One who took it for you. . .
. . . And be reminded of Good Friday every day of the year.

Adam’s Story

0
Let me introduce to you a young man named Adam Andro.* Adam is a world-class juvenile delinquent. He has just passed his sixteenth birthday, but has a record longer than most criminals in maximum-security prisons. He was born to a life of crime, and has known nothing but selfish, wild living. He hasn’t seen his parents in years, as they too are criminals, and for all he knows they may not even still be alive. Adam lives lawlessly, spending seven days a week living for himself with no regard for anyone else — and always avoiding staying in any one place too long for fear of being identified and taken into custody. He has no regard for God (aside from using God’s name in frequent swearing). He nourishes himself on stolen food and longs for everything that is not his, while not valuing what is his. He has become quite familiar with the women of the street, and would not be at all ashamed to tell you about the violent murder he took part in last month (all for a little food… and some gold jewelry…) His most recent major crime was an act of first-degree robbery, where at gunpoint he stole the wallet of a local judge, Yah Theon. Skilled criminal that he is, he made himself scarce before the police had time to arrive.  But he was finally caught and jailed, sure to be on death row before long.
We next find Adam in a courtroom**, under heavy guard and in handcuffs and chains. Even in his lawless mind he knows he is deserving of death. The local jurisdiction does make use of the death penalty, and he fully expects to receive it. His only hope now is the sentence will be speedy and he can be rid of this life.
Let’s join in now. The evidence against Adam is overwhelming, and even the court-appointed attorney found little he could say in the defense of this pitiful boy that he represented that afternoon. The prosecutor, Luci Fer, has produced an enormous list of crimes against Adam, which is taking her a very long amount of time to recite.
But finally the jury is dismissed to deliberate.  After only a few short moments, they return and have unanimously found Adam guilty.**  Judge Yah Theon, yes, the very same judge who had been robbed at gunpoint, is ready to give the verdict.
The gavel comes down.
“GUILTY!”  Yah Theon roars.  ”I hereby pronounce the sentence of death…
…on my son Cristos!”
Adam is in shock. His life has been one injustice after another… inflicted by him upon someone else. Yet even to his depraved mind this seems to be a far greater injustice yet. He knows nothing about Cristos (though his name is strikingly similar to a name Adam frequently uses as a curse word), but knows that this is definitely not right.
The jury is incensed and all of a sudden begins to direct their rage at Judge Theon. Though secretly guilty of violations of the law themselves, the jury is incensed that someone as blatantly guilty as Adam should be pardoned. But the demands of the law have been met, and the bailiff is seen walking over to Adam and removing his chains and handcuffs. The judge — now smiling! — pronounces Adam free to go.**
The observers in the courtroom are screaming their outrage. This is one judge who can’t expect to be retained at the next election! Adam remains frozen in shock, unable to even move.  But then Judge Yah speaks once more, with a smile on his face.  The same face toward which Adam has not that long ago pointed a gun and demanded everything.
“I rule the adoption final.”
The crowd boos and hisses.
Judge Yah throws off his court robes and wraps Adam up in a long embrace. **
Then he says: “Let’s go home, SON.”
And they go home to the judge’s home…
Adam’s new home.
——–
If this story angers you, you do not know grace.
If this story humbles you as you realize you are Adam Andro, welcome home.
——–
(* Fictitious name. “Adam” and “Andro” are from the Hebrew and Greek words for “man” — as “Adam” in this story represents a significant portion of mankind.)
(** The courtroom scene, including the guilt, substitution, and adoption, is elaborated from a sermon illustration in “Persuading Our Condemning Heart: 1 John 3:18-22a”, a sermon delivered by Pastor Eric Olson on Sunday, February 24th, 2008. Click here to listen to the original sermon from which this scene was drawn. All other elements of the story, such as the account of the degree of Adam’s evil actions, are believed to be original content.)
Revised on November 14, 2010.
Go to Top