Posts tagged legalism

What Do We Bring to Salvation? Anything?

0

This is a topic I have learned quite a bit more about over the last year or so, coming from a background emphasizing the importance of good works (we do good and God loves us for it) rather than grace (we bring nothing, not even love for God, yet still He loves us). A common manifestation of a works-based environment is the need to always strive for perfection in order to be accepted, both by God and others. Even if people who hold to this form of works-based righteousness deny this charge, I believe it applies nonetheless as the attitude is not one of complete brokenness and emptiness but rather trying to bring something of value to God and then letting Him “take care of the rest.” As if we had anything to bring that could be used as a starting point for God! The point is that anything we try to do in order to look good to God, and to be more acceptable to him, will fail. It looks so good to us; other Christians might stand in awe at how spiritual another is, but in reality, it’s basically filth. Excrement. “Filthy rags,” the Bible calls it.

Good Friday

0

Good Friday.

The first question one often asks when considering the name of the day is “why is it called ‘good’?”. (Answer: derived from “holy Friday”, c. 1290 A.D., via German “Gute Freitag“.) The question is often raised due to the traditional observation of the day with sadness, gloom, and mourning.
To many, even to some who profess faith in Jesus Christ, the true purpose of the day seems to be lost. Consider this quotation: “An incarnate God!!! An eternal, self-existent, omnipresent omniscient Author of this stupendous Universe, suffering on a Cross!!! My Soul starts with horror, at the Idea, and it has stupified the Christian World. It has been the Source of almost all of the Corruptions of Christianity.” (John Adams)

Or even megachurch leader Joel Osteen, who does not deny the importance of the cross but seeks to downplay its remembrance in favor of positive thinking: “We don’t have crosses up there. We believe in all that, but I like to take the barriers down that have kept people from coming. A lot of people who come now are people that haven’t been to church in 20 to 30 years.”

But it is not just famous people such as these. Many other professing Christians speak of Good Friday as unimportant, boring, and sad. They may even speak of it in tragic terms.
And in response I say this: If you cannot be humbly grateful that the death penalty was paid for you when you perfectly deserved to be on receiving end of the firing squad — then perhaps you would rather have had to die for your own sins? Is the cross of no value to you? Whether we want to admit it or not, sin is real, and thus, punishment is real. It will not be stayed, as that would be unjust. No one deserves to be spared, but the fact is that Jesus took the punishment for some. That’s right, the punishment was taken and the record cleared.
So if you still want to go ahead and downplay Good Friday, then make sure you do a good job of living your life beyond perfection and see where it gets you.
Or realize the true greatness of what was done on Good Friday, and realize that the punishment has been taken by a Substitute, despite the death penalty being entirely deserved, and go free in forgiveness. Humbly realize your best goodness still wouldn’t be enough to have the death sentence cancelled, and rely fully on the One who took it for you. . .
. . . And be reminded of Good Friday every day of the year.

When to Take A Stand?

2

So when is it appropriate to take a stand and when is it not?

Yesterday’s post could be taken as meaning that it’s not right to have and stand up for one’s views, or to believe that one’s views are not true. That’s not what I meant. Everyone is entitled to their interpretations, views, etc. and has a right to defend them. And would anyone believe in something that they did not also believe was true and right?
I have interpretations and views that I strongly hold to and defend on this blog. I believe they are true; were I to be persuaded otherwise then I would neither hold to nor promote these views.
Some say that all “controversial” beliefs need to be done away with. They say that if people have no doctrine and just love each other then Christianity will be better off. But what is left with doctrine? Not necessarily the deep and oft-debated doctrines, but still the doctrines from Scripture nonetheless. If we take away doctrine, we’re left with a feel-good theology. Maybe it’s “seeker-sensitive,” but is it true anymore? If the Gospel is diluted, it’s not the Gospel at all.
There is definitely a place, then, for opposing modern man-centered theology. Are proponents of this theology necessarily evil? No. I would say misguided, but not evil. There are a great many fellow Christians (even the majority in the USA) who hold to this. Disagreement with them does not mean that they are hell-bound. But disagreement is, nonetheless, legitimate.
But a means of “debate” in which opponents who are also fellow Christians are branded as evil, stupid, or anti-God; told to “shut up”, etc. is not the right way to handle such a discussion.
Just wanted to clarify…

Do we need a Christian No-Spin Zone?

0

Yeah, I was kind of mad at B. O’R. when I wrote this. I actually appreciate some of what he has to say now.

Tonight we’ll consider the “No Spin Zone” — perhaps one of the most famous elements of modern television news programming. All sorts of people make guest appearances on a particular television commentator’s show only to be interrupted, degraded, and told why (s)he is wrong. (Wrong = disagreeing with the host, failing to toe the unspoken but assumed party line, etc.) Free from “spin” (which by context we have to assume must mean nonpartisan fairness) issues such as foreign involvements, presidential approval, and culture become blacker than black and whiter than white.

Imagine what could happen if we had some equivalent… the Christian No-Spin Zone! No more gray areas. Everything in clear, crisp black and white… you are either right or wrong. Be on my side and you’re on God’s side; disagree and sniff for brimstone. Here one could get the straight truth (as truthy as truthiness can be) on any potential debate under the sun.
Absurd? Of course. What earns high TV ratings as part of a political machine ought to be entirely out of place in a Christian setting.
But is it? I’m afraid not. I’ve read posts and even articles by people in various Christian circles who would probably be more than elated if a proposition such as that in paragraph #2 were to become a reality. Sometimes they ban dissenters from their communities. Other times they try to prove that debate is of the devil. And yet other times in very black-and-white terms they attempt to show that you can see things black-and-white or you can be wrong. Even entertain thoughts that differ from the party line, and see how quickly you last before you become “the most ridiculous item of the day” in groups such as these.
Thankfully we have the Scriptures and the Holy Spirit to guide us. What room is there for the leading of the Spirit and freedom in Christ in a formulaic, legalistic religion? And for those walking in the Spirit and experiencing Christian freedom, what place is there for purported gurus who would reduce liberty to a list of dos and don’ts? Isn’t that basically replacing the role of the Holy Spirit (God) with man? Now THAT’S the “most ridiculous item of the day!”

0

I haven’t exactly been the most prolific blogger lately. There are many topics I’d like to address — as well as various periodic updates that could be of interest — if I just had more time to write. Rest assured that more posts will be coming soon.

I’ve noticed on a particular message board for current and former homeschoolers the prevalence of questions and topics that are clearly the product of legalism. Some people live in fear that something may be an unknown sin. Others constantly seek the unwritten guidebook of exactly how to live, what to listen to, how to dress, and who to spend time with. Still others just want to make sure that everyone knows exactly what their position is on these issues. I’d like to just go through there and clarify that this kind of fear — and this apparent fascination with standards — isn’t necessary and even distracts from a proper relationship with God. Much time can be spent pontificating, but ultimately… (Ecc. 12:13) The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.

And also, from the Westminster Shorter Catechism:

Q. 1. What is the chief end of man?
A. Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.

Enjoy… did you see that? Enjoy!

Q. 2. What rule hath God given to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him?
A. The Word of God, which is contained in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, is the only rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him.

No Basic Seminar manuals, no guides to “Christian living”, nothing but the Bible. (Not even Westminster, even though it’s up there among the best summaries of doctrine and Biblical teaching.)

Q. 3. What do the Scriptures principally teach?
A. The Scriptures principally teach, what man is to believe concerning God, and what duty God requires of man.

Why look elsewhere?

Now on another topic: for Nebraskans, have you checked out My Bridge Radio? This network reaches from Scottsbluff to Ashland over-the-air and worldwide at mybridgeradio.com. Musically, for a small regional station they seem to have the largest playlist I’ve heard aside from satellite radio. In the short amount of time that I’ve listened to the station I have heard worship music ranging from the 1970′s (“Father, I Adore You”) to this decade (“Be Lifted High”) — plus Christian contemporary music from artists ranging from Larry Norman (1977) to Britt Nicole (2007). Check it out in Lincoln at 94.5 and 99.1 FM, or other frequencies across Nebraska. It has more variety than K-Love and far fewer ads than Salem Communications.
In other news, it seems I may get more travel this year than I expected. Currently it looks like just a week apart I’ll have two out-of-state excursions: an air-and-ground trip to Mississippi, also including Tennessee, Michigan, and Minnesota… and then (probably) a train trip to Winter Park, CO.
Finally… just a reminder for all you Southerners who may be reading this… it is cold up north!

December frost - 01

December frost - 03

December frost - 09

Still a few months before Nebraska looks like this again…
Platte Valley  057

…and sights like this can be seen here…
Fireworks Show at Haymarket Park

Saltdogs Game

…and elsewhere.
Chicago Trip - 248.jpg

Chicago Trip - 171.jpg

Brrrr.
December frost - 08

Pain and Failure

0

http://www.joelwnelson.com/articles/A%20Scandalous%20Freedom.pdf
Concluding the series on Christian Freedom, based on principles from Steve Brown’s book A Scandalous Freedom.

How often do we hear statements indicating that Christians shouldn’t have to experience pain or suffering — or that if there is pain or suffering, it is because a wrong was committed? Many “Christian” organizations have spent a large amount of time and used a large amount of ink in furthering this idea. Well-meaning (hopefully!) Christians tell others that if they are ill, or if they have experienced loss, that it is because they have done something to offend God. If someone experiences pain, it may be that they have caused God pain. People are instructed to confess sin, purge homes of anything that could be “unclean”, and then have faith and hope to be healed. Steve Brown relates a story of a woman who had been told by some Christians that “if she had enough faith and exercised the right principles, her small child, who had juvenile diabetes, would get well… They told her she had to demonstrate her faith by stopping the regular insulin injections. If she did that, they counseled her, then God would honor her faith and heal her child.” There’s nothing quite like manipulating God and then calling if faith, is there!?
Brown continues with “The Truth About Pain“: that some things aren’t fixed, life is not easy, God sometimes grants healing, and Christians don’t get a pass. Since the Fall, there are some things in life that are imperfect and even painful. Until things are made right in the new earth, there are unpleasant things that Christians will have to deal with — we are not exempt. I don’t buy into that “Christian Perfection” teaching that misleads people into thinking that it is possible to be perfect and live a perfect life this side of glorification. Bad things will happen in life, and all we are doing is lying to ourselves and others if we believe or let others believe otherwise. In a section entitled “What Happens When We Try to Avoid Pain“, Brown writes that “the point is that we get ourselves into trouble when we think we don’t have it bad, when we try to avoid having it bad, or when we pretend it isn’t bad. If you don’t acknowledge your problem, you can’t fix it. If you pretend you don’t have a problem, you can’t fix anybody else’s problem. And if you believe that you shouldn’t have a problem, you will kill yourself with guilt over your problem.
The Christian life isn’t one big party every day. Pain exists. Suffering exists. People do bad things and reap the consequences. Brokenness happens. And anytime we try to cover it up and put on the appearance that everything is good, we stifle freedom. People need to be able to be themselves, not who others expect them to be. Brown relates the story of a church that put on a missionary luncheon… for missionaries only. The purpose of this is so that missionaries home on furlough could talk to one another and be themselves and not have to put on the extra-spiritual, “it’s all good” attitude that the congregations expect. That’s healthy! What’s not healthy is the expectation. You already know what’s coming next… the expectations rob from the freedom each deserves.
When we don’t run from pain and hurt — but instead face it head on — we find that then we can really experience God’s grace and mercy. The self-sufficient person who has everything going great has no need of any help from God (or so it seems). But to the broken, God is everything because there is nothing else left.
Brown opens the next chapter (The Failure We Foster, and the Victory That Sets Us Free) with a quote from an anonymous individual who wrote, “I’m a failure, and it has been good for me to be a failure. I’ve learned so much from my mistakes, and God has allowed me to see him in a far different and more profound way that I did before. Thank you for your prayers. I praise God that he is in charge of every circumstance.
Brown continues by stating that “most bad theology is bad psychology.” The emotional state of an individual — and how that individual emotionally views the world — will have a great impact on that individual’s theological beliefs. This makes the truth hard for each person to see, as their idea of “truth” is shaped by what may be a very inaccurate worldview. For a lot of people it is guilt — the idea that “I’m too bad to ever expect good from God.” These people typically try to earn God’s favor through good works, all the while motivated by their guilt. Brown writes that “guilty people make people feel guilty, and you can tell how guilty a person really is by perceiving how guilty you feel in his or her presence.” We become what others expect us to be, and what our own worldview dictates we be. But freedom comes from realizing that we can never be good enough to earn God’s grace. We can’t buy His love no matter what we do. It’s all His work anyway… so what’s there to be guilty about? I’d say there’s much more to be thankful for!
In the next section, Brown takes a look at two words that are often used wrongly by Christians. The first is success. This is almost a hallmark of evangelicalism — many books are written to teach Christians and non-Christians alike how to manipulate God in order to get blessings from Him and be successful in this world. One quasi-cult has made “success” one of its seven principles that it promotes in seminars, trying to show people how doing just the right things can result in a breakthrough to success. Success, according to Brown, “focuses on something else entirely: becoming all that God would have you to be.” The truth is that despite all the reasons why we might be undeserving of good things, God is in control and will carry out His plan no matter what. It’s not about living according to basic principles, praying the prayer of Jabez, or anything like that. Those are just feeble attempts to buy love and get earthly success. True success, for a Christian, may look much different than it does to the world (and to much of evangelicalism). True success is being who God wants you to be.
The other word is humility. We’re so proud we want everyone else to see just how humble we are, and parade our humility in churches so others can be encouraged. This is false humility, condemned by Paul. Humility isn’t even a sanctified inferiority complex. It’s knowing that everything good is from God; nothing is from our own efforts… and being grateful to God. Contrast that to pride, which often manifests itself in the church as demonstrations by pious people on just how many laws they can abide by. Now you tell me who is the more free individual.
Brown continues with a look at the Law of God. The Bible says, “More to be desired are they than gold, even much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb. Moreover, by them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward.” Brown writes, “That passage almost always surprises Christians. We don’t have any trouble with the first part about the law being perfect; it’s the “gold”, “honey”, and “reward” part that we don’t understand. Do you know why? Because we have come to see the law of God as a negative thing given by a negative God to negative people who will never get it right. We either nullify the law by saying it no longer applies to Christians who “don’t live under the law, but under grace,” or we give the law a condemning power God never intended. In either case we get in trouble.” Brown continues by showing that the law isn’t something designed to get us in trouble and keep us from having any fun, but is instead “a schematic for the way the world works.” It’s also “a safeguard” — following it provides protection against deviating from what is right. It is not, however, what makes us good. Legalists and others will reduce the law to a bunch of “dos” and “don’ts” so that if you follow the law, you have tapped into the higher level of religion that everyone else ignores. It becomes a pride thing… and a way to supposedly buy extra love from God. No, this isn’t what the law is for. The law, according to Brown, “is the tutor that brings you to Christ.” It’s also “the glue that keeps us there.” We’ll never be good enough to keep the law (only Christ could), but because of Christ’s righteousness imputed to us, the legal demands are met. Isn’t that freeing? We can’t, and haven’t, and won’t keep the law… but because of Christ, God is not angry at us? This is the stuff the legalists can’t handle. They can explain it away, call it a misinterpretation, maybe even call it heresy… but it’s true. God isn’t angry at us because we have Christ’s righteousness imputed to us. And in this, we have freedom and success. And we should have humility too, realizing it sure isn’t anything we ever did that brought us to this place.
Major premise: Christians are undeserving sinners, and I’m an undeserving sinner.
Minor premise: God’s grace is bigger than my sin, and his love is bigger than my failure.
Conclusion: Therefore, I gratefully accept any blessing he deems proper for me.”
Satan wants us to believe that we are inferior. He’s an expert at using the law (and Scripture) to make us believe it — and then try really hard to work our way back to grace. Many Christians have let themselves become his pawns in accomplishing this. We need to remember that we’re undeserving but God’s love is bigger than our failure.
The last chapter in the book is “The Path We Avoid, and the Journey That Sets Us Free.” In this short, final chapter, Brown points out the spontaneity of freedom. He says, “something about freedom gets lost when one starts obeying certain rules in order to attain it. Forget about ten steps to freedom. Nobody can tell you that if you do certain things, you will be free. If someone (other than Jesus) tells you that you will be free only if you do what he or she says, you’re being lied to.” He also points out a couple things about freedom and the potential misuses people may struggle with when they realize what a gift they have. Some become “bound by efforts to be free.” These individuals try so hard to be free from legalism that they become licentious… “freedom” becomes a coverup for evil. Of course, the evil then becomes addicting, and the individual is just as bound as ever before. In other words, that’s not freedom.
Sometimes we become “so obsessed we lose it.” This refers to the kind of person who wants to be so sure he or she is doing things right that he or she becomes obsessed with the details. Why? Brown says that “if you get obsessive over rules and laws, you will end up breaking them all.” He also says, “Let it go, and quit making your goodness the issue! This isn’t about you and me; it’s about Jesus. When you obsess over anything but him — and that includes being free — you can lose it. Jesus is freedom, and to the degree you stay focused on him, you will find yourself free.
If you don’t obsess over Jesus, will he still love you? Of course he will — but you be careful out there.
Sometimes we can also be afraid of freedom. People who have been bound in legalism for a long time can be afraid to take any steps because the old nature keeps coming back, telling us that the rules and regulations are safer and better. The past can’t be changed… only the present, which leads to the future. Move on. We also can’t be defined by others. There will always be someone who becomes angered by freedom. Let them be. They aren’t Jesus. “Jesus called us his ‘friends’ and offered us unconditional love. Jesus called himself our elder brother. God highly values us and has adopted us into his family. That is our reality, and that is how God wants us to define ourselves.
So what is the most important thing? Our freedom isn’t something that we have to covet and guard, because it’s given freely. In this world we talk about freedom not being free, and how much it costs to remain free. Aren’t we glad that the Kingdom of God is entirely opposite?
Yet at the same time, “free people remain free to give up their freedom. They bestow freedom on others by giving up their own.” . . . “In The Freedom of a Christian, Martin Luther said, “To make the way smoother for the unlearned — for only them do I serve — I shall set down the following two propositions concerning the freedom and the bondage of the spirit: A Christian is a perfectly free lord of all, subject to none. A Christian is a perfectly dutiful servant of all, subject to all.
So many people are so bound — so angry, so afraid, in such need of appearing right and righteous, so condemning, so bound by rules and regulations, so lonely, so afraid that someone will reveal their secrets, so sure that God is angry with them, so empty, in such doubt — and they can’t tell anybody.”
But we’re free from that. We need to extend this freedom to people who aren’t — even if it is offensive to them — in hopes that they may experience this freedom which is freely available. And the most important thing? To me, it’s that no matter how many mistakes we make, how many times we fall short, it doesn’t reduce God’s love for us even a tiny bit. That’s the foundation of freedom.
This concludes the series on freedom based on Steve Brown’s book, A Scandalous Freedom.
Go to Top